MOAS
Mother of All Shorts
A directory of top 300+ crypto projects and why they'll go to zero
Short them on Hyperliquid, ByBit or MEXC
Why it's going to zero:
- The Bitcoin network consumes more electricity than entire countries, making it environmentally unsustainable
- The Lightning Network has failed to solve the scalability issues after years of development
- Centralization of mining power in a few countries creates a severe security risk
- Regulatory crackdowns will render it unusable for legitimate financial purposes
- Its extreme volatility makes it impractical as a currency or store of value
Why it's going to zero:
- Gas fees remain prohibitively expensive despite numerous promises to fix them
- The Ethereum Foundation has too much control, betraying the 'decentralization' promise
- The shift to Proof of Stake has centralized power with wealthy token holders
- Smart contract vulnerabilities have led to billions in stolen funds
- Layer 2 solutions add complexity without solving fundamental issues
Why it's going to zero:
- Completely centralized under Binance's control, defeating the purpose of crypto
- Regulatory issues with Binance will inevitably impact BNB
- The Binance Smart Chain is plagued with scams and copycat projects
- No real utility beyond fee discounts on a single exchange
- History of opaque token burns designed to artificially inflate price
Why it's going to zero:
- Ongoing SEC lawsuit proves it was an unregistered security all along
- Ripple founders and executives hold massive amounts of XRP
- Ripple controls the majority of XRP supply, creating extreme centralization
- Banks are developing their own solutions rather than using XRP
- Original use case for cross-border payments is being solved by CBDCs
Why it's going to zero:
- Development moves at a glacial pace with constant delays
- Smart contracts took years to implement and are severely limited
- Academic approach has resulted in theory over practical applications
- Minimal developer adoption despite years in the market
- No significant DApps or usage despite enormous promises
Why it's going to zero:
- Network constantly experiences outages and downtime
- Centralized in a small number of validators with massive hardware requirements
- Token distribution heavily favors VCs who will dump at the right time
- Security vulnerabilities exposed multiple times
- Sacrifices decentralization and security for speed
Why it's going to zero:
- Created as a literal joke with no technological innovation
- Unlimited supply with constant inflation weakening price over time
- Development is practically non-existent
- Value is completely dependent on Elon Musk tweets
- No real utility beyond tipping and memes
Why it's going to zero:
- Parachain auction model has failed to generate meaningful adoption
- Overly complex ecosystem that even developers struggle to understand
- Governance system is vulnerable to capture by large DOT holders
- Cross-chain interoperability solved by simpler alternatives
- Tokenomics dilute value with a continuous issuance model
Why it's going to zero:
- Self-proclaimed 'Dogecoin killer' with no unique technology
- Artificially inflated market cap with quadrillions of tokens
- Created purely to capitalize on meme coin mania
- No utility beyond speculative trading
- Unable to scale beyond being a simple ERC-20 token
Why it's going to zero:
- Sacrifices decentralization for transaction throughput
- Unsustainable subnet model that fragments security
- Validators require expensive hardware, leading to centralization
- Heavy competition from other EVM-compatible chains
- Token economics favor early investors and VCs
Why it's going to zero:
- Founder Justin Sun has a history of questionable marketing tactics and legal issues
- Whitepaper was largely plagiarized from other projects
- Centralized governance structure controlled by Sun and a few 'super representatives'
- Constantly overpromises and underdelivers on technology
- Focused on gambling dApps and high-risk DeFi rather than real-world utility
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralization of Ethereum staking defeating ETH's decentralization narrative
- Significant counterparty risk if Lido protocol has vulnerabilities
- Potential cascade effect if de-pegging occurs during market stress
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Ethereum upgrade issues could lead to mass liquidations
Why it's going to zero:
- Completely centralized custodial model with BitGo as a single point of failure
- Adds unnecessary custodial risk to Bitcoin exposure
- Creates a fractional reserve system that could collapse under stress
- Regulatory crackdowns on custodial wrapped assets are inevitable
- Unnecessary complexity when native cross-chain solutions exist
Why it's going to zero:
- Mining app that requires no actual computing power is likely a data harvesting scheme
- Network has been in 'testnet' for years with no mainnet launch
- Cannot be traded on exchanges, creating artificial scarcity and value
- Pyramid scheme structure where early adopters benefit from recruiting others
- Zero utility besides recruiting more users to the network
Why it's going to zero:
- Created by Bitfinex to cover up an $850 million loss from the Crypto Capital scandal
- Value entirely dependent on Bitfinex's promise to buy back tokens
- Exchange tokens become worthless if the exchange faces regulatory issues
- Tether/Bitfinex regulatory problems will directly impact LEO
- No utility outside the Bitfinex ecosystem
Why it's going to zero:
- Token not necessary for the network to function effectively
- Oracle services could be provided without a specific token
- Team continuously dumps tokens on the market to fund operations
- Centralized node operators create single points of failure
- Diminishing token value as more competitors enter the oracle space
Why it's going to zero:
- Governed by a council of corporations - the opposite of decentralization
- Patented technology that contradicts open-source blockchain principles
- Centralized control of the network by a small group of validators
- Marketing hype around transactions per second that don't translate to actual usage
- Enterprise blockchain solutions consistently fail to gain adoption
Why it's going to zero:
- Double-wrapped token adding layers of complexity and risk
- Compound risk from both Lido and the wrapping mechanism
- Smart contract vulnerabilities in either layer can lead to total loss
- Regulatory risks from multiple layers of financial engineering
- Creates daisy-chain dependency risks across DeFi platforms
Why it's going to zero:
- Failed to gain significant adoption for cross-border payments
- Centralized control through the Stellar Foundation
- Original use cases now being served by CBDCs and stablecoins
- No compelling reason for XLM token to accrue value
- Competing directly with traditional finance systems that have more resources
Why it's going to zero:
- Relatively unknown stablecoin with limited market acceptance
- Small team with limited resources to handle regulatory challenges
- Minimal transparency about reserve assets
- Limited exchange support compared to USDT and USDC
- Will be crushed by competition from major financial institutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Sacrifices decentralization for transaction throughput
- Unsustainable subnet model that fragments security
- Validators require expensive hardware, leading to centralization
- Heavy competition from other EVM-compatible chains
- Token economics favor early investors and VCs
Why it's going to zero:
- Another VC-dominated Layer 1 with enormous token allocations to insiders
- Move programming language has limited developer adoption
- Technology not substantially different from existing Layer 1 chains
- Heavy token inflation schedule that will suppress price long-term
- Created by ex-Meta employees with minimal blockchain experience
Why it's going to zero:
- Self-proclaimed 'Dogecoin killer' with no unique technology
- Artificially inflated market cap with quadrillions of tokens
- Created purely to capitalize on meme coin mania
- No utility beyond speculative trading
- Unable to scale beyond being a simple ERC-20 token
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin clone with minor technical differences that has failed to innovate
- Founder Charlie Lee sold all his holdings at the peak in 2017
- No compelling use case that isn't better served by Bitcoin or other alternatives
- Decreasing developer activity and market relevance year after year
- Privacy features came too late to differentiate from Monero and Zcash
Why it's going to zero:
- Failed Bitcoin fork that has seen minimal adoption
- Block size increase proved insufficient for scaling needs
- Community constantly fracturing into additional forks
- Controlled by a small group of miners and early adopters
- Transaction volume continues to decline year over year
Why it's going to zero:
- Originally developed by Telegram, abandoned after SEC pressure, now run by a foundation
- Telegram could develop its own token again, making TON obsolete
- Centralized control by a small group of developers
- Regulatory uncertainties due to its Telegram connection
- Governance issues with no clear path to true decentralization
Why it's going to zero:
- Parachain auction model has failed to generate meaningful adoption
- Overly complex ecosystem that even developers struggle to understand
- Governance system is vulnerable to capture by large DOT holders
- Cross-chain interoperability solved by simpler alternatives
- Tokenomics dilute value with a continuous issuance model
Why it's going to zero:
- Unnecessary complexity in wrapping ETH when native solutions exist
- Smart contract risks that could lead to fund loss
- Potential regulatory issues as wrapped tokens face scrutiny
- Will become obsolete as ETH gains more native functionality
- Centralization risks with contract upgrades and governance
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure DeFi project with limited adoption beyond yield farming
- Governance token with minimal actual governance utility
- Heavy competition in an overcrowded DeFi space
- Revenue model relies on unsustainable yield strategies
- Team pivots frequently, indicating lack of clear vision
Why it's going to zero:
- Experimental stablecoin using complex derivatives for backing
- Untested mechanism that could collapse under market stress
- Regulatory risks from using crypto derivatives for collateral
- Heavy reliance on perpetual futures that could be manipulated
- Another algorithmic stablecoin experiment after multiple previous failures
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token with value dependent on a single centralized entity
- Will be worthless if Bitget faces regulatory issues
- No utility beyond trading fee discounts
- History of regulatory issues in multiple jurisdictions
- Artificially inflated trading volume to appear larger than it is
Why it's going to zero:
- Double centralization risk from both Tether and Binance
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Regulatory risks from both Tether and Binance
- Creates synthetic exposure with additional points of failure
- Less liquid than native USDT with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
Why it's going to zero:
- Perpetual futures protocol in an overcrowded derivatives market
- Regulatory crackdown on crypto derivatives is inevitable
- Token primarily used for governance with minimal value accrual
- Platform encourages excessive leverage and gambling
- Limited liquidity compared to established derivatives exchanges
Why it's going to zero:
- Triple-wrapped Ethereum creating multiple layers of risk
- Each wrapping layer introduces additional smart contract vulnerabilities
- Counterparty risk multiplies with each wrapping layer
- Will be obsolete as liquid staking evolves
- Extreme complexity makes it impossible for average users to understand the risks
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token with no utility beyond its own platform
- Smaller exchange with limited long-term viability
- Token value evaporates if exchange faces regulatory issues
- Artificial buy pressure from fee discounts creates false demand
- Team continuously sells tokens to fund operations
Why it's going to zero:
- Governance token with minimal utility beyond voting
- Protocol fee switch never activated despite years of discussions
- Value capture mechanism doesn't exist, making token fundamentally worthless
- Regulatory scrutiny on DEXs is increasing globally
- Facing competition from more efficient AMM designs and CEXs
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy focus makes it a prime target for global regulatory bans
- Increasingly delisted from regulated exchanges
- Mining centralization despite ASIC-resistant algorithm
- Transaction throughput limitations with growing blockchain size
- Increasing government capability to trace transactions despite privacy features
Why it's going to zero:
- Synthetic stablecoin with multiple layers of counterparty risk
- Lacks transparency about the underlying collateral
- Limited adoption and exchange support
- Will be rendered obsolete by traditional financial institution stablecoins
- Regulatory crackdown on synthetic assets is looming
Why it's going to zero:
- Another VC-dominated Layer 1 with huge insider allocations
- Created by ex-Meta employees from the failed Diem project
- Move language has limited developer adoption
- No significant technical advantages over existing Layer 1s
- Heavy token emission schedule that will continuously suppress price
Why it's going to zero:
- Overcollateralized model is capital inefficient
- Heavy reliance on centralized stablecoins as collateral
- Governance captured by large MKR holders
- Vulnerable to cascading liquidations during market crashes
- Will be made obsolete by traditional finance stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Another interchangeable Layer 1 in an overcrowded market
- Sharding implementation continuously delayed
- Limited developer adoption despite heavy incentives
- Token economics favor early VCs and insiders
- Minimal differentiation from other smart contract platforms
Why it's going to zero:
- Lending protocol with minimal revenue compared to token value
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual mechanism
- Increasingly targeted by regulators as unauthorized securities lending
- Smart contract risks across multiple chains
- Traditional finance moving into crypto lending with better regulatory compliance
Why it's going to zero:
- Abandoned chain with minimal development activity
- History of 51% attacks due to low security
- No meaningful ecosystem or developer activity
- Exists primarily for ideological reasons rather than utility
- Continually decreasing hash rate making it more vulnerable to attacks
Why it's going to zero:
- Overcomplicated DeFi platform with limited real-world adoption
- Token has minimal utility beyond governance
- Will face severe regulatory scrutiny for tokenized securities
- Complex risk management that most users don't understand
- Team continuously sells tokens to fund operations
Why it's going to zero:
- Overhyped launch with massive token price crash
- Centralized control by the DFINITY Foundation
- Unrealistic promises about replacing traditional internet infrastructure
- Node operators require expensive specialized hardware
- Complex governance system that favors large token holders
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme coin with zero utility or technological innovation
- Created solely to capitalize on the frog meme trend
- No development team or roadmap
- Pump and dump scheme for early investors
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token dependent on OKX's regulatory compliance
- Minimal utility beyond trading fee discounts
- Centralized control by the exchange
- Will collapse if OKX faces regulatory action
- Artificial value created through token burns rather than real demand
Why it's going to zero:
- Another exchange token with no value beyond its platform
- Gate.io has faced regulatory issues in multiple jurisdictions
- History of listing questionable tokens and projects
- Minimal transparency about token burns and treasury management
- Will be worthless if exchange faces serious regulatory action
Why it's going to zero:
- Another Ethereum Layer 2 in an increasingly crowded market
- No meaningful differentiation from other rollups
- Backed by BitDAO which has its own governance issues
- Limited adoption despite heavy token incentives
- Governance token without clear value accrual mechanism
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized wrapped BTC entirely dependent on Coinbase's stability
- Regulatory risks as Coinbase faces increased scrutiny
- Unnecessary intermediary when other Bitcoin solutions exist
- Limited utility beyond Coinbase's ecosystem
- Adds counterparty risk to Bitcoin exposure
Why it's going to zero:
- Overcomplicated delta-neutral stablecoin system
- Uses derivatives as backing, creating multiple layers of risk
- Will face regulatory scrutiny as derivatives-backed stablecoin
- Unproven model with potential for cascading failures in market stress
- Governance token with minimal value accrual beyond speculation
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token entirely dependent on Crypto.com's success
- Massive marketing budget with little sustainable growth to show for it
- History of sudden policy changes that harm token holders
- Aggressive cashback cuts showed the fragility of their token model
- Will be worthless if Crypto.com faces regulatory issues
Why it's going to zero:
- Pure political meme coin with no technological value
- Created to capitalize on election speculation
- Zero utility beyond political gambling
- Will crash after election cycle completes
- Founders will inevitably dump tokens on supporters
Why it's going to zero:
- Supply chain blockchain with limited real-world adoption despite years in operation
- Centralized governance through the VeChain Foundation
- Consistently overpromises partnership impact
- Two-token system (VET/VTHO) creates unnecessary complexity
- Enterprise blockchain solutions consistently fail to deliver value
Why it's going to zero:
- Small exchange token in an overcrowded market
- Limited exchange volume compared to larger competitors
- Regulatory risks as smaller exchanges face compliance challenges
- No meaningful utility beyond its own platform
- Will be crushed by larger exchanges with more resources
Why it's going to zero:
- Newer stablecoin with limited market adoption
- Minimal transparency about reserve assets
- Regulatory risks as stablecoins face increased scrutiny
- Limited utility beyond trading pairs on some exchanges
- Will be crushed by established stablecoins with bigger network effects
Why it's going to zero:
- Overhyped AI blockchain with minimal practical applications
- Economic model rewards validators regardless of actual AI utility
- Extremely complex system that most investors don't understand
- Governance captured by large token holders
- Will be rendered obsolete by real AI developments outside crypto
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized Bitcoin staking derivative with multiple counterparty risks
- Limited transparency about how BTC is actually staked
- Regulatory risks as BTC staking services face scrutiny
- Smart contract vulnerabilities could lead to total loss
- Adds unnecessary complexity to simple Bitcoin exposure
Why it's going to zero:
- Rebranded from MATIC indicating identity crisis
- Multiple competing Layer 2 scaling solutions with better technology
- Increasingly centralized validator set
- Originally positioned as Ethereum scaling solution but now competing with Ethereum
- ZK rollup solutions from competitors are more efficient
Why it's going to zero:
- Storage costs significantly higher than centralized alternatives
- Mining equipment requirements led to centralization
- Token economics incentivize speculation over actual storage usage
- Years behind original development roadmap
- Limited adoption despite enormous ICO funding
Why it's going to zero:
- Pure Proof of Stake model leads to centralization
- Limited DApp ecosystem despite years of development
- Early token distribution favored insiders and VCs
- Minimal developer adoption despite aggressive grant programs
- No clear use case that isn't better served by other chains
Why it's going to zero:
- Hub and spoke model failed as most Cosmos chains bypass the Hub
- ATOM token has minimal value capture from ecosystem growth
- Governance system vulnerable to capture by large stakeholders
- Inter-blockchain communication adoption slower than expected
- Original vision of Internet of Blockchains underdelivered
Why it's going to zero:
- Gambling-focused token with limited use beyond its platform
- Regulatory risks as gambling tokens face increased scrutiny
- Small team with limited resources compared to established gambling platforms
- Centralized control of the token and platform
- Will be crushed by larger gambling platforms with more liquidity
Why it's going to zero:
- Modular blockchain design that adds unnecessary complexity
- Data availability layer with limited proven use cases
- Governance token with minimal value accrual mechanism
- Heavy insider token allocation to VCs and team
- Will be rendered obsolete as Ethereum scaling improves
Why it's going to zero:
- Layer 2 scaling solution with centralized sequencer
- Governance token without meaningful value capture
- Security depends entirely on Ethereum's security
- DAO governance captured by large token holders
- Will be made obsolete by Ethereum's own scaling solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Another Bitcoin alternative with minimal differentiation
- DAG-based consensus with unproven security at scale
- Limited developer activity compared to established chains
- No clear use case beyond being another payment network
- Will remain in the shadow of more established cryptocurrencies
Why it's going to zero:
- Distributed GPU rendering network with limited adoption
- Centralized control through the Render Network
- More expensive than centralized rendering solutions
- Regulatory risks as utility tokens face securities classification
- Will be made obsolete by AI-specific rendering hardware
Why it's going to zero:
- Ethereum Layer 2 with centralized sequencer
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Heavy competition from other Layer 2 solutions
- DAO governance captured by large token holders and insiders
- Will be made obsolete by Ethereum's own scaling solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Rebranded from Fantom indicating identity crisis
- DAG-based consensus with questionable security guarantees
- Lost relevance in DeFi after initial popularity
- Limited developer activity despite incentive programs
- No clear differentiation from other smart contract platforms
Why it's going to zero:
- AI hype token with no actual artificial intelligence technology
- Created to capitalize on AI buzzwords
- Vague roadmap with unrealistic promises
- Team lacks AI research credentials
- Will be exposed as vaporware when bull market ends
Why it's going to zero:
- Token for a Solana DEX aggregator with minimal utility
- Value entirely dependent on Solana's ecosystem health
- Regulatory risks as DEXs face increased scrutiny
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Will lose relevance if Solana faces more technical issues
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token dependent on KuCoin's regulatory compliance
- History of security issues and hacks
- Minimal utility beyond KuCoin's platform
- Will be worthless if KuCoin faces serious regulatory action
- Artificially inflated value through token burns
Why it's going to zero:
- Double centralization risk from both Ethereum and Binance
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Regulatory risks from both Ethereum and Binance
- Creates synthetic exposure with additional points of failure
- Less liquid than native ETH with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure token with unclear utility and purpose
- Minimal market presence and exchange listings
- Vague value proposition without technical differentiation
- Small team with limited resources
- Will disappear in the next bear market
Why it's going to zero:
- Another Bitcoin derivative with multiple counterparty risks
- Small protocol with limited security auditing
- Unclear regulatory status as a synthetic asset
- Minimal liquidity compared to other BTC derivatives
- Adds unnecessary complexity to Bitcoin exposure
Why it's going to zero:
- Multiple layers of restaking creating compound risks
- Small DAO with limited security resources
- Complex tokenomics that most users don't understand
- Multiple points of failure across the restaking process
- Will be made obsolete by more efficient staking solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Enterprise blockchain solution with limited proven adoption
- Extremely high token price creates barrier to actual usage
- Overvalued compared to actual revenue and adoption
- Centralized control through the Quant Network
- Enterprise blockchain solutions consistently fail to deliver value
Why it's going to zero:
- Enterprise-focused blockchain with limited actual adoption
- Trade finance use case being developed by established financial institutions
- Centralized validator set controlled by the foundation
- ISO 20022 compliance claims overstate actual integration
- Will be overtaken by traditional finance blockchain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Generic DeFi platform with no clear differentiation
- Limited adoption despite token incentives
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Small team with limited development resources
- Will be forgotten in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized lending platform with counterparty risk
- Regulatory risks as crypto lending faces increased scrutiny
- History of changing terms for token holders
- Will follow Celsius and other lenders into insolvency during next crisis
- Dividend model creates securities regulation risks
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized ETH staking with additional smart contract risks
- Limited adoption compared to centralized staking solutions
- Complex node operator requirements limit scalability
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more efficient staking solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Governance token with declining relevance as DAI loses market share
- DAI increasingly backed by centralized assets, defeating its purpose
- Complex governance system captured by large token holders
- Will face serious regulatory challenges as an unauthorized bank
- Cannot compete with traditional finance stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Social trading platform with limited user adoption
- Regulatory risks as copy trading faces securities regulation
- Small team with limited resources
- Token has minimal utility beyond governance
- Will be crushed by larger trading platforms
Why it's going to zero:
- Derivatives exchange facing increasing regulatory scrutiny
- Limited liquidity compared to centralized alternatives
- Complex Cosmos-based architecture adds unnecessary friction
- Governance token with minimal value accrual mechanism
- Will struggle to compete with established derivatives exchanges
Why it's going to zero:
- Another stablecoin in an overcrowded market
- Limited transparency about reserve assets
- Minimal exchange support compared to established stablecoins
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
- Cannot compete with stablecoins backed by large institutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin smart contract platform with limited adoption
- Complex architecture dependent on Bitcoin's security
- Developer experience inferior to native smart contract platforms
- Minimal DApp ecosystem despite years of development
- Will be made obsolete by Bitcoin's own smart contract capabilities
Why it's going to zero:
- Gaming-focused Layer 2 with limited adoption outside incentivized games
- Token value entirely dependent on gaming partnerships
- NFT gaming hype has largely collapsed since peak
- Centralized control through the Immutable company
- Will struggle as traditional gaming companies develop their own solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Trading-focused Layer 1 with minimal differentiation
- VC-dominated token distribution
- Performance claims overstated compared to real-world usage
- Heavy token inflation schedule that will suppress price
- Limited developer adoption beyond incentivized projects
Why it's going to zero:
- Utility network with unclear value proposition
- Years of delays before finally launching
- Controversial XRP airdrop distribution
- Oracle system with minimal adoption
- No clear use case that isn't better served by existing solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy nightmare requiring biometric eye scanning
- Founded by Sam Altman with centralized control
- Legal challenges in multiple countries over data collection
- Universal basic income claims without sustainable funding model
- Token economics designed to enrich early investors
Why it's going to zero:
- Governance token for centralized ETH staking service
- Minimal value accrual from staking operations
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Concentration of staked ETH creates systemic risk for Ethereum
- Will be made obsolete by more decentralized staking solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Video delivery network with minimal adoption by content creators
- Centralized validator set controlled by large companies
- Two-token system (THETA/TFUEL) creates unnecessary complexity
- Cannot compete with established CDN providers on cost or reliability
- Solution in search of a problem that doesn't exist
Why it's going to zero:
- Indexing service with minimal revenue compared to token value
- Centralized control through The Graph Foundation
- Complex delegation and curator system that few understand
- Token economics create constant selling pressure
- Most queries made through free hosted service, not paid network
Why it's going to zero:
- Double centralization risk from both Solana and Binance
- Dependent on Solana's unstable network
- Creates multiple points of failure for SOL exposure
- Regulatory risks from both Solana and Binance
- Smart contract vulnerabilities could lead to total loss
Why it's going to zero:
- Another ETH staking derivative adding more complexity
- Controlled by BitDAO with limited transparency
- Multiple counterparty risks across staking process
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more efficient staking solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure Bitcoin derivative with additional chain risks
- Complex cross-chain mechanism with multiple points of failure
- Minimal liquidity and exchange support
- Will be crushed by more established Bitcoin derivatives
- Smart contract vulnerabilities could lead to total loss
Why it's going to zero:
- Solana meme coin with zero utility
- Created purely to capitalize on dog coin mania
- Value entirely dependent on Solana's ecosystem health
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
- Massive supply making long-term value appreciation impossible
Why it's going to zero:
- Failed Ethereum competitor despite $4 billion ICO
- Centralized block producer system captured by Chinese entities
- Abandoned by original development team Block.one
- Continuously declining developer activity and usage
- Resource model (CPU/NET/RAM) too complex for widespread adoption
Why it's going to zero:
- Self-amending ledger concept failed to drive meaningful adoption
- Continuous governance disputes since launch
- Limited DApp ecosystem despite years of development
- Cannot compete with larger smart contract platforms
- On-chain governance captured by large bakers
Why it's going to zero:
- Gaming token with minimal successful game releases
- Web3 gaming has failed to attract mainstream players
- Token economics centered around NFT speculation
- Multiple competing gaming platforms with more resources
- History of pivoting development focus and missing roadmap milestones
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized stablecoin completely controlled by PayPal
- Defeats the purpose of cryptocurrency by being tied to a traditional financial institution
- Can be frozen or seized at PayPal's discretion
- Regulatory dependence means it carries all the risks of traditional banking
- No advantage over simply using regular PayPal services
Why it's going to zero:
- Minimal transparency about actual gold reserves
- Centralized custody with all the counterparty risks of Tether
- Gold redemption process is prohibitively complex for most users
- No independent audits of gold reserves
- Combines the worst aspects of both physical gold and crypto
Why it's going to zero:
- Token grafted onto a protocol that worked fine without tokens for decades
- Controlled by Tron and Justin Sun, known for questionable practices
- Failed to deliver on promises of improved file sharing
- Excessive token supply creating constant selling pressure
- Solution in search of a problem that doesn't exist
Why it's going to zero:
- Double centralization risk from both Circle and Binance
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Creates multiple points of failure for simple USDC exposure
- Regulatory risks from both Circle and Binance
- Less liquid than native USDC with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
Why it's going to zero:
- Metaverse hype has died with minimal active users remaining
- Land prices have collapsed as speculation ended
- Poor user experience compared to traditional gaming
- Development progress has been extremely slow
- Centralized control despite decentralization marketing
Why it's going to zero:
- Overhyped 'Japan's first legal crypto' with minimal adoption
- Data management use case could be solved without blockchain
- Massive token dilution has destroyed investor value
- Obscure team with limited transparency
- Marketing focused on price rather than actual utility
Why it's going to zero:
- Unnecessary wrapper for BNB adding smart contract risk
- Relies entirely on the stability of Binance and BNB
- Multiple points of failure from both Binance and the wrapping contract
- Will be made obsolete by improvements to native BNB
- Regulatory risks from Binance's global legal challenges
Why it's going to zero:
- Failed to deliver on feeless transactions at scale
- Centralized coordinator still required despite promises to remove it
- IoT partnerships have not materialized into actual adoption
- Multiple internal governance conflicts and team changes
- Cannot compete with purpose-built IoT solutions from major tech companies
Why it's going to zero:
- Solana MEV protocol with limited utility beyond its niche
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Entirely dependent on Solana's health and stability
- Vulnerable to Solana's frequent network outages
- Value proposition only appeals to a small set of technical users
Why it's going to zero:
- Triple layer of risk - Bitcoin to WBTC to Arbitrum
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Dependent on both BitGo and Arbitrum's security
- Regulatory risks across multiple centralized entities
- Complex unwrapping process with high fees
Why it's going to zero:
- Another layer of Ethereum restaking adding more complexity and risk
- Small protocol with limited security oversight
- Multiple smart contract risks across the staking process
- Regulatory risks as restaking faces increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more efficient staking solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme-inspired Layer 1 with limited technical differentiation
- VC-dominated token distribution favoring insiders
- Governance token with minimal utility beyond voting
- Heavy token inflation schedule that will suppress price
- Will struggle to compete with established Layer 1s
Why it's going to zero:
- Controlled by Craig Wright, who falsely claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto
- Multiple failed attempts to legally force recognition as 'real Bitcoin'
- Minuscule hash rate making it vulnerable to 51% attacks
- Extremely centralized development and mining
- Virtually no merchant or exchange support due to reputation issues
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure DeFi protocol with minimal market presence
- Limited exchange listings and liquidity
- Governance token with no clear value accrual mechanism
- Small team with limited development resources
- Will disappear in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- NFT-focused blockchain that missed the NFT bull run
- Created by Dapper Labs with centralized control
- Failed to expand beyond NBA Top Shot success
- Poor token economics leading to constant value dilution
- Cannot compete with established chains for developer attention
Why it's going to zero:
- Liquid staking derivative dependent on Solana's stability
- Vulnerable to Solana's frequent network outages
- Governance captured by large token holders
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Smart contract vulnerabilities could lead to total loss
Why it's going to zero:
- Another algorithmic stablecoin after multiple previous failures
- Limited transparency about backing assets
- Small team with limited resources to handle crises
- Minimal adoption and exchange support
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized stablecoin controlled by traditional finance giant
- Defeats the purpose of cryptocurrency by being tied to BlackRock
- Can be frozen or seized at BlackRock's discretion
- No advantage over traditional BlackRock funds
- Undermines crypto's original anti-institutional ethos
Why it's going to zero:
- Domain service with limited utility beyond Ethereum
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from name registrations
- Revenue entirely dependent on Ethereum's adoption
- Competitors offering cheaper alternatives across multiple chains
- Vulnerable to Ethereum's high gas fees during peak usage
Why it's going to zero:
- Dog-themed meme coin with zero utility or innovation
- Created to capitalize on Elon Musk's dog's name
- Marketing focuses on price pumps rather than technology
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized gold-backed token with counterparty risk
- Minimal transparency about actual gold reserves
- Gold redemption process is prohibitively complex for most users
- High fees compared to traditional gold investment vehicles
- Will be replaced by more efficient gold-backed tokens from traditional finance
Why it's going to zero:
- Former 'Chinese Ethereum' that failed to gain meaningful adoption
- Centralized governance through the NEO Foundation
- Limited developer ecosystem despite years in operation
- Two-token system (NEO/GAS) creates unnecessary complexity
- Cannot compete with Ethereum or newer smart contract platforms
Why it's going to zero:
- Remittance-focused token facing competition from established fintech
- Limited adoption by telecom providers despite years of effort
- Regulatory challenges in multiple jurisdictions
- Cannot compete with traditional remittance services on cost or speed
- Token unnecessary for the actual remittance service to function
Why it's going to zero:
- Oracle service with minimal differentiation from Chainlink
- Governance token with limited utility beyond voting
- Centralized data providers defeating the purpose of decentralization
- Oracle manipulation risks creating systemic vulnerabilities
- Will struggle to compete with more established oracle networks
Why it's going to zero:
- Another algorithmic stablecoin after multiple previous failures
- Complex mechanism that few users understand
- Limited transparency about collateral backing
- Vulnerable to de-pegging during market stress
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Another Solana staking derivative adding unnecessary complexity
- Vulnerable to Solana's frequent network outages
- Smart contract vulnerabilities could lead to total loss
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Limited differentiation from other SOL staking services
Why it's going to zero:
- Rebranded from Elrond indicating identity crisis
- Sharding implementation has not delivered promised scalability
- Minimal DApp ecosystem despite years of development
- Metaverse pivot following hype without delivering results
- Cannot compete with established Layer 1s for developer attention
Why it's going to zero:
- Generic DeFi token with limited use beyond its own platform
- Governance token with minimal value accrual mechanism
- Small team with limited development resources
- Competing in an overcrowded DeFi market
- Will be forgotten in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Play-to-earn game with collapsed player base and economy
- Ponzi-like economic model requiring constant new players
- History of massive hacks and security breaches
- Failed to innovate beyond basic gameplay
- Cannot compete with traditional gaming on entertainment value
Why it's going to zero:
- Solana-based AMM entirely dependent on Solana's health
- Vulnerable to Solana's frequent network outages
- Governance token with minimal fee capture
- Heavy competition from other DEXes on multiple chains
- Will struggle to maintain relevance as Solana faces challenges
Why it's going to zero:
- Metaverse with virtually no active users despite massive valuation
- Land prices have collapsed as speculation ended
- Poor user experience compared to traditional gaming
- Development progress has been extremely slow
- Cannot compete with Web2 virtual worlds on usability or content
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy-focused blockchain with minimal differentiation
- Cannot compete with established privacy coins like Monero
- Regulatory risks as privacy coins face increased scrutiny
- Limited exchange listings due to compliance concerns
- Small development team with limited resources
Why it's going to zero:
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from trading fees
- Victim of multiple DeFi exploits and vulnerabilities
- Declining trading volumes as DeFi activity drops
- Governance system captured by large token holders
- Regulatory risks as DeFi exchanges face increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Sidechain created for Axie Infinity with minimal other uses
- History of massive $600M+ hack showing security vulnerabilities
- Entirely dependent on Axie Infinity's declining ecosystem
- Centralized validator set controlled by Sky Mavis
- Will become irrelevant as play-to-earn gaming collapses
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy coin with limited adoption outside privacy enthusiasts
- Regulatory risks as privacy coins face increased scrutiny
- Development funding model creates constant selling pressure
- Most users don't use privacy features, defeating its purpose
- Cannot compete with more user-friendly privacy solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Algorithmic stablecoin with fractional reserve backing
- Complex mechanism vulnerable to market stress
- Regulatory risks as stablecoins face increased scrutiny
- Multi-token system (FRAX/FXS) creates unnecessary complexity
- Cannot compete with fully-backed stablecoins on stability
Why it's going to zero:
- Stablecoin with history of questionable reserve management
- Multiple ownership changes creating trust issues
- Limited market adoption compared to USDT and USDC
- Regulatory risks as stablecoins face increased scrutiny
- Cannot compete with stablecoins issued by major financial institutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Bridged ETH with multiple points of failure
- Smart contract vulnerabilities on both Ethereum and Base
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Adds unnecessary complexity to simple ETH exposure
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Double-wrapped ETH creating multiple layers of risk
- Dependent on both Mantle and Ethereum's security
- Smart contract vulnerabilities across multiple protocols
- Regulatory risks as restaking faces increased scrutiny
- Unnecessarily complex for average users to understand
Why it's going to zero:
- Bridged ETH with multiple points of failure
- Smart contract vulnerabilities on both Ethereum and Arbitrum
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Adds unnecessary complexity to simple ETH exposure
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme coin with zero utility beyond speculation
- Created purely to capitalize on dog coin mania
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Explicitly named for market manipulation
- Zero utility beyond price speculation
- Designed as a short-term pump and dump scheme
- No legitimate development team or roadmap
- Will collapse once initial hype fades
Why it's going to zero:
- IoT network with minimal actual usage despite years of operation
- Migrated to Solana after failing on its own blockchain
- Mining rewards have collapsed as token economics failed
- Centralized control through the Helium Foundation
- Cannot compete with traditional IoT networks on reliability or cost
Why it's going to zero:
- Derivatives exchange facing increasing regulatory scrutiny
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from trading fees
- Multiple pivots showing lack of clear direction
- Cannot compete with established derivatives exchanges on liquidity
- Regulatory crackdown on crypto derivatives is inevitable
Why it's going to zero:
- Base-specific AMM with limited differentiation
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Entirely dependent on Base's ecosystem growth
- Heavy competition from other DEXes across multiple chains
- Will struggle to maintain relevance in an overcrowded market
Why it's going to zero:
- DEX token on Binance Smart Chain with inflationary tokenomics
- Continuous emission schedule creating constant selling pressure
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from trading fees
- Regulatory risks as DEXs face increased scrutiny
- Cannot compete with more efficient AMM designs on fees or slippage
Why it's going to zero:
- Wrapped meme coin adding another layer of risk
- Dependent on both Dogecoin and Binance's stability
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Adds unnecessary complexity to already risky DOGE exposure
- Combines the worst aspects of meme coins and wrapped tokens
Why it's going to zero:
- NFT platform created during the NFT bubble
- Connected to Tron ecosystem with questionable governance
- NFT market has collapsed with minimal recovery prospects
- Generic token ticker 'NFT' indicating lack of originality
- Will become irrelevant as NFT speculation continues to decline
Why it's going to zero:
- Ethereum Layer 2 with proprietary programming language
- Steep learning curve limiting developer adoption
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Heavy competition from other Layer 2 solutions
- Will be made obsolete by Ethereum's own scaling solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Bridge-wrapped stablecoin with multiple points of failure
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Creates unnecessary counterparty risk for USDC exposure
- Less liquid than native USDC with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain USDC
Why it's going to zero:
- Multi-chain lending platform with limited adoption
- Complex cross-chain mechanism creating security risks
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from lending
- Cannot compete with more established lending protocols
- Regulatory risks as lending platforms face increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure token with minimal market presence or utility
- Limited exchange listings and trading volume
- No clear use case or technological innovation
- Small team with questionable development track record
- Will disappear in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Another ETH staking derivative in an oversaturated market
- Smart contract risks across the staking process
- Limited differentiation from other staking solutions
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more established staking providers
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme token with no technological value or utility
- Created purely to capitalize on green/plant-themed token trend
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Zero utility beyond speculative trading
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Sports fan token platform with limited real utility
- Fan tokens have failed to provide meaningful engagement
- Team continuously sells tokens to fund operations
- Regulatory concerns as fan tokens may be classified as securities
- Traditional sports franchises building their own Web3 solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Permanent storage model economically unsustainable long-term
- One-time payment cannot fund perpetual storage costs
- Storage costs significantly higher than centralized alternatives
- Limited adoption outside crypto-native projects
- Token economics don't align with actual storage costs
Why it's going to zero:
- Bridge-wrapped Bitcoin with multiple points of failure
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Dependent on both Avalanche and bridge provider security
- Less liquid than native BTC with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Generic protocol with unclear value proposition
- Governance token with minimal utility beyond voting
- Limited adoption and exchange support
- Small team with limited development resources
- Will be forgotten in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Another Layer 1 blockchain in an overcrowded market
- Limited differentiation from existing smart contract platforms
- Small developer ecosystem despite incentive programs
- VC-dominated token distribution favoring insiders
- Cannot compete with established Layer 1s for developer attention
Why it's going to zero:
- Chinese-focused blockchain with regulatory uncertainty
- Tree-Graph consensus hasn't delivered promised scalability
- Limited adoption outside of China
- Centralized governance and development
- Regulatory risks from Chinese government crypto policies
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure Bitcoin derivative with multiple layers of risk
- Limited transparency about backing mechanism
- Small team managing significant Bitcoin holdings
- Minimal liquidity and exchange support
- Will be crushed by more established Bitcoin derivatives
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin Cash fork of a Bitcoin fork showing identity crisis
- Redenomination gimmick to appear cheaper than it is
- Minimal development activity or innovation
- Cannot compete with Bitcoin or established payment cryptocurrencies
- Limited adoption despite years in the market
Why it's going to zero:
- Governance token for Bored Ape ecosystem with minimal utility
- Created during NFT mania with declining relevance
- Value entirely dependent on waning Bored Ape brand popularity
- Controlled by Yuga Labs despite claims of decentralization
- NFT market collapse has undermined its core value proposition
Why it's going to zero:
- Treasury-backed token with unnecessary blockchain component
- Regulatory risks as tokenized securities face increased scrutiny
- Centralized control defeating the purpose of cryptocurrency
- No advantage over traditional treasury bond investments
- Will be made obsolete by government-issued digital currencies
Why it's going to zero:
- Identity crisis with rebrand to POL showing strategic confusion
- Multiple competing Layer 2 solutions with better technology
- Increasingly centralized validator set
- Originally positioned as Ethereum scaling but now competing with Ethereum
- ZK rollup solutions from competitors are more efficient
Why it's going to zero:
- Yield-bearing stablecoin with multiple counterparty risks
- Limited transparency about underlying yield generation
- Regulatory risks from unregistered securities offering
- Small team managing significant financial assets
- Will be made obsolete by regulated yield-bearing products
Why it's going to zero:
- Blast-specific stablecoin with limited utility beyond one chain
- Regulatory risks as stablecoins face increased scrutiny
- Centralized control through the Blast team
- Cannot compete with multi-chain stablecoins on adoption
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Lending protocol with minimal revenue compared to token value
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Declining TVL and usage since DeFi summer peak
- Regulatory risks as crypto lending faces increased scrutiny
- Smart contract vulnerabilities have led to millions in losses
Why it's going to zero:
- Wallet token with minimal utility beyond governance
- Binance-owned wallet creating centralization concerns
- Token unnecessary for the wallet to function properly
- Limited value accrual mechanism beyond speculative trading
- Will be made obsolete by more feature-rich wallet solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Yield-bearing stablecoin with securities regulatory risks
- Centralized control through Ondo Finance
- Limited transparency about underlying yield generation
- Adds blockchain complexity to traditional financial products
- Will be replaced by regulated yield-bearing digital currencies
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized ETH staking service with counterparty risk
- Limited market presence and adoption
- Smart contract risks across the staking process
- Regulatory risks from both staking and centralized custody
- Will be made obsolete by more decentralized staking solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Cross-chain DEX with history of security breaches
- Complex mechanism creating multiple attack vectors
- Limited liquidity compared to centralized alternatives
- Regulatory risks as DEXs face increased scrutiny
- Cannot compete with centralized exchanges on user experience
Why it's going to zero:
- Failed algorithmic reserve currency experiment
- Ponzi-like rebasing model that collapsed as expected
- Token price crashed over 99% from peak
- Multiple pivots indicating lack of viable business model
- Cannot recover from fundamental design flaws
Why it's going to zero:
- Cross-chain infrastructure with multiple security vulnerabilities
- Bridge technology inherently vulnerable to hacks
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
- Cannot overcome the fundamental security trilemma of bridges
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme coin with zero utility beyond speculation
- Bear-themed token created during market mania
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- NFT-based token created after NFT market peak
- Value entirely dependent on waning Pudgy Penguins NFT popularity
- No utility beyond NFT ecosystem governance
- Will collapse as NFT speculation continues to decline
- Cannot transition to meaningful utility beyond collectibles
Why it's going to zero:
- Another ETH staking derivative in an oversaturated market
- Smart contract risks across the staking process
- Limited differentiation from other staking solutions
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more established staking providers
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme token named after S&P 500 with silly number appended
- No utility beyond speculative trading
- Created to capitalize on financial markets-themed tokens
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure token with unclear utility or purpose
- Limited market presence and exchange listings
- Small team with minimal track record
- No clear technological differentiation
- Will disappear in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Yield trading protocol with complex mechanics
- Limited adoption outside DeFi power users
- Extremely complex for average users to understand
- Regulatory risks as yield derivatives face scrutiny
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized wrapped Bitcoin with limited adoption
- Complex mechanism with multiple points of failure
- Cannot compete with more established wrapped Bitcoin solutions
- Multiple security and design flaws in previous versions
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Collateral token for Flexa with minimal adoption
- SEC classified it as an unregistered security
- Payment use case better served by stablecoins
- Declining merchant adoption and usage
- Cannot compete with traditional payment networks on efficiency
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy-focused blockchain with minimal differentiation
- Cannot compete with established privacy coins
- Limited exchange listings due to compliance concerns
- Small developer community with limited resources
- Regulatory risks as privacy coins face increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Ethereum-based prediction market with limited adoption
- Multiple pivots showing lack of product-market fit
- Failed to deliver on original prediction market vision
- Token primarily used for expensive validator slots
- Cannot compete with traditional prediction markets on liquidity
Why it's going to zero:
- Vault token for unreleased Berachain blockchain
- Speculative asset for a network that doesn't exist yet
- Multiple layers of risk across staking and new blockchain
- Will collapse if Berachain fails to launch successfully
- Team pivots frequently indicating lack of clear vision
Why it's going to zero:
- Failed algorithmic stablecoin system that collapsed catastrophically
- Lost over 99.99% of its value during the crash
- Founder Do Kwon facing criminal charges in multiple countries
- Abandoned by original developers after the collapse
- Cannot recover from fundamental design flaws and reputational damage
Why it's going to zero:
- Bridged USDT with multiple points of failure
- Dependent on both Tether and Mantle's security
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Less liquid than native USDT with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Stablecoin that's being phased out after regulatory issues
- Paxos forced to stop issuing BUSD by regulators
- Declining market cap as users migrate to other stablecoins
- Double centralization risk from both Paxos and Binance
- Will eventually be completely deprecated
Why it's going to zero:
- Zero-knowledge blockchain with limited practical applications
- Technical limitations have prevented promised scaling
- Limited developer adoption despite years of development
- Small ecosystems compared to established Layer 1s
- Technology too complex for most developers to utilize effectively
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme coin named after a person with zero utility
- Created purely to capitalize on name-based token trend
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Centralized ETH staking token entirely dependent on Coinbase
- Regulatory risks as Coinbase faces increased scrutiny
- Will be worthless if Coinbase faces serious legal challenges
- Adds counterparty risk to ETH staking exposure
- Cannot compete with more decentralized staking solutions long-term
Why it's going to zero:
- Tron-based DeFi platform controlled by Justin Sun
- History of copying other protocols without innovation
- Connected to Tron ecosystem with questionable governance
- Limited adoption outside Tron ecosystem
- Cannot compete with more established DeFi protocols
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy-focused MimbleWimble blockchain with limited adoption
- Cannot compete with established privacy coins like Monero
- Regulatory risks as privacy coins face increased scrutiny
- Limited exchange listings due to compliance concerns
- Small development team with limited resources
Why it's going to zero:
- Lending optimization protocol with limited utility
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Dependent on other lending protocols' health
- Regulatory risks as DeFi lending faces increased scrutiny
- Adds unnecessary complexity to already complex DeFi stack
Why it's going to zero:
- Bridged ETH with multiple points of failure
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Dependent on both Ethereum and Polygon's security
- Less liquid than native ETH with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Two-token stablecoin system with unnecessary complexity
- Minimal adoption despite years of development
- Constantly changing tokenomics and mechanisms
- Cannot compete with established stablecoins on adoption
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- DEX aggregator with minimal fee capture for token holders
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Heavy competition from other aggregators and DEXs
- Regulatory risks as DEXs face increased scrutiny
- Margin compression from competition eroding potential profit
Why it's going to zero:
- Synthetic assets platform with declining usage
- Complex staking and collateralization system
- Regulatory risks as synthetic assets face securities classification
- Governance system captured by large token holders
- Cannot compete with traditional derivatives on liquidity or efficiency
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized cloud computing with minimal adoption
- Cannot compete with AWS, Azure, and GCP on reliability or cost
- Limited provider network compared to centralized alternatives
- Complex for developers to deploy compared to traditional solutions
- Token unnecessary for the service to function properly
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized CDN with minimal adoption
- Cannot compete with established CDNs on reliability or cost
- Limited node network compared to centralized alternatives
- AI and blockchain combination creating unnecessary complexity
- Token economics don't align with actual content delivery costs
Why it's going to zero:
- Generic DeFi token with unclear utility or purpose
- Limited market presence and exchange listings
- Small team with minimal track record
- No clear technological differentiation
- Will disappear in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Restaking protocol adding compound risk to ETH staking
- Centralization of Ethereum security through shared validators
- Creates systemic risk for the entire Ethereum ecosystem
- Complex mechanism that most users don't understand
- Regulatory risks as restaking faces increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Another ETH staking derivative in an oversaturated market
- Smart contract risks across the staking process
- Limited differentiation from other staking solutions
- Will be made obsolete by more established staking providers
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Another algorithmic stablecoin despite numerous previous failures
- Complex mechanism vulnerable to market stress
- Limited transparency about collateral backing
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
- Cannot compete with fully-backed stablecoins on stability
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized computing platform with minimal adoption after years
- Cannot compete with centralized cloud providers on cost or reliability
- Complex for developers to use compared to traditional solutions
- Limited provider network despite years of development
- Token unnecessary for the computing service to function properly
Why it's going to zero:
- Another ETH staking derivative in an oversaturated market
- Smart contract risks across the staking process
- Limited differentiation from other staking solutions
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more established staking providers
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token for MEXC with limited utility
- Value entirely dependent on a single exchange's success
- No utility beyond trading fee discounts
- Will be worthless if MEXC faces regulatory issues
- Cannot compete with larger exchange tokens on liquidity
Why it's going to zero:
- Origin Protocol ETH derivative with multiple layers of risk
- Smart contract vulnerabilities across multiple protocols
- Complex tokenomics that most users don't understand
- Limited differentiation from other ETH derivatives
- Regulatory risks as DeFi faces increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Hardware wallet token with minimal utility beyond governance
- Token unnecessary for the wallet to function properly
- Limited value accrual mechanism beyond speculative trading
- Cannot compete with established hardware wallet providers
- Will be made obsolete by more feature-rich wallet solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Cross-chain bridge with history of massive $320M hack
- Bridge technology inherently vulnerable to security issues
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
- Cannot overcome the fundamental security trilemma of bridges
Why it's going to zero:
- Early Bitcoin fork that failed to gain meaningful adoption
- Privacy features made irrelevant by more advanced solutions
- Masternode system creating centralization concerns
- Regulatory risks as privacy coins face increased scrutiny
- Cannot compete with Bitcoin or other payment cryptocurrencies
Why it's going to zero:
- Another ETH derivative from Frax ecosystem
- Complex tokenomics tied to algorithmic stablecoin system
- Smart contract risks across multiple protocols
- Regulatory risks as DeFi faces increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more established ETH derivatives
Why it's going to zero:
- Polkadot's 'canary network' with declining relevance
- Limited utility beyond testing for Polkadot
- Parachain auction model has failed to generate meaningful adoption
- Value proposition undermined by Polkadot's own struggles
- Will become irrelevant as Polkadot matures or fails
Why it's going to zero:
- Utility token for Theta Network with minimal adoption
- Two-token system (THETA/TFUEL) creates unnecessary complexity
- Cannot compete with established CDN providers on cost or reliability
- Centralized validator set controlled by large companies
- Solution in search of a problem that doesn't exist
Why it's going to zero:
- Ethereum Layer 2 with centralized sequencer
- Governance token without meaningful value accrual
- Heavy competition from other Layer 2 solutions
- DAO governance vulnerable to capture by large token holders
- Will be made obsolete by Ethereum's own scaling solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Compound-wrapped WBTC creating triple layer of risk
- Smart contract vulnerabilities across multiple protocols
- Dependent on both Compound and BitGo's security
- Adds unnecessary complexity to Bitcoin exposure
- Will be made obsolete by more efficient Bitcoin derivatives
Why it's going to zero:
- Triple layer of risk - Bitcoin to WBTC to Polygon
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Dependent on both BitGo and Polygon's security
- Less liquid than native BTC with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Credit history blockchain with minimal real-world adoption
- Cannot solve the oracle problem for credit data
- Regulatory challenges for cross-border credit reporting
- Traditional credit bureaus have more data and resources
- Solution in search of a problem that's better solved without blockchain
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin derivative with multiple layers of risk
- Complex cross-chain mechanism with security vulnerabilities
- Limited adoption and liquidity
- Smart contract risks across multiple protocols
- Will be made obsolete by more established Bitcoin derivatives
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin Ordinals token with no clear utility
- Bloats the Bitcoin blockchain with unnecessary data
- Created purely for speculation rather than utility
- Will become irrelevant as Ordinals hype fades
- No meaningful use case beyond collectibles
Why it's going to zero:
- AI hype token with no actual AI technology
- Created to capitalize on AI buzzwords
- Vague roadmap with unrealistic promises
- Team lacks AI research credentials
- Will be exposed as vaporware when bull market ends
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure token with minimal market presence
- Limited exchange listings and trading volume
- No clear use case or technological innovation
- Small team with questionable development track record
- Will disappear in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Polkadot parachain with limited adoption
- dApp staking model creating unsustainable economics
- Heavy competition from other smart contract platforms
- Cannot compete with established Layer 1s for developer attention
- Value entirely dependent on Polkadot's success
Why it's going to zero:
- Snake-themed meme coin with zero utility
- Created purely to capitalize on animal meme trends
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- NFT marketplace token created after NFT market peak
- Artificial trading volume through excessive token incentives
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Cannot compete with established NFT marketplaces long-term
- Will collapse as NFT speculation continues to decline
Why it's going to zero:
- Early sharding blockchain that failed to gain meaningful adoption
- Technical promises undelivered despite years of development
- Limited developer ecosystem compared to competitors
- Multiple pivots to metaverse and other trends showing desperation
- Cannot compete with newer, more efficient Layer 1 blockchains
Why it's going to zero:
- Brave browser token with limited utility beyond the browser
- Failed to revolutionize digital advertising as promised
- Most users opt out of the token system entirely
- Minimal value accrual mechanism as advertisers use fiat
- Cannot compete with established advertising platforms
Why it's going to zero:
- Gaming platform token with minimal adoption
- Value entirely dependent on unproven gaming ecosystem
- Heavy competition from established gaming platforms
- Token unnecessary for the platform to function properly
- Will be forgotten in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Layer 1 blockchain with minimal adoption despite years of development
- Complex architecture creating unnecessary friction for users
- Limited developer ecosystem despite incentive programs
- Cannot compete with established Layer 1s for attention
- Token economics create constant inflation pressure
Why it's going to zero:
- Juvenile meme coin with zero utility
- Created purely as a joke during market mania
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on immature humor
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Rebranded Gnosis Safe with limited token utility
- Governance token for a product that worked fine without a token
- Minimal value accrual from actual product usage
- DAO governance captured by large token holders
- Token unnecessary for the core multisig product
Why it's going to zero:
- Generic ETH staking derivative in an oversaturated market
- Smart contract risks across the staking process
- Limited differentiation from other staking solutions
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Will be made obsolete by more established staking providers
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin-Ethereum hybrid that failed to gain meaningful adoption
- Jack of all trades, master of none approach to blockchain
- Limited developer ecosystem despite years of operation
- Cannot compete with either Bitcoin or Ethereum on their specialties
- Multiple pivots showing lack of clear vision
Why it's going to zero:
- Algorithmic stablecoin launched after Terra's collapse
- Created by Justin Sun with questionable reputation
- History of depegging despite overcollateralization claims
- Connected to Tron ecosystem with centralization concerns
- Cannot compete with fully-backed stablecoins on stability
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy-focused Layer 1 with limited adoption
- ParaTime architecture creating unnecessary complexity
- Limited developer ecosystem despite incentive programs
- Cannot compete with established Layer 1s for attention
- Privacy features insufficient to differentiate from competitors
Why it's going to zero:
- Second token for the same platform showing identity crisis
- Derivatives exchange facing increasing regulatory scrutiny
- Multiple chain migrations creating user confusion
- Cannot compete with established derivatives exchanges on liquidity
- Regulatory crackdown on crypto derivatives is inevitable
Why it's going to zero:
- Liquidity aggregator with minimal differentiation
- Governance token with no clear value accrual mechanism
- Heavy competition from other DeFi liquidity solutions
- Limited adoption despite incentive programs
- Will struggle to maintain relevance in overcrowded market
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized video infrastructure with minimal adoption
- Cannot compete with centralized streaming on cost or quality
- Complex tokenomics deterring mainstream usage
- Limited demand for decentralized video transcoding
- Token unnecessary for the service to function properly
Why it's going to zero:
- Web3 social layer with limited user adoption
- Browser extension model creating significant friction
- Cannot compete with native Web3 social platforms
- Token unnecessary for core privacy features
- Will be made obsolete by mainstream social media Web3 integration
Why it's going to zero:
- Metaverse platform launched after metaverse hype peaked
- Limited user adoption despite marketing claims
- Cannot compete with established gaming and virtual worlds
- Vague roadmap with unrealistic promises
- Will fade into obscurity as metaverse bubble deflates
Why it's going to zero:
- Meme coin explicitly named to mock cryptocurrencies
- Created as a joke with zero utility or innovation
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- AI hype token named to mimic VC firm a16z
- Created to capitalize on AI and VC buzzwords
- No actual AI technology or VC backing
- Team lacks AI research credentials
- Will be exposed as vaporware when bull market ends
Why it's going to zero:
- DEX infrastructure token with declining relevance
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from protocol fees
- Cannot compete with newer, more efficient DEX protocols
- Token unnecessary for the protocol to function properly
- Regulatory risks as DEX infrastructure faces increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Gas token for VeChain creating unnecessary complexity
- Two-token system (VET/VTHO) has failed to create value
- Supply constantly increases while demand remains low
- Completely dependent on VeChain's limited adoption
- Will become worthless if VeChain fails to gain traction
Why it's going to zero:
- Sui-based orderbook DEX with limited adoption
- Entirely dependent on Sui blockchain's success
- Cannot compete with established DEXs on liquidity
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Will struggle to maintain relevance in overcrowded DEX market
Why it's going to zero:
- Double-wrapped ETH derivative creating multiple layers of risk
- Complex tokenomics tied to algorithmic stablecoin system
- Smart contract risks across multiple protocols
- Will be made obsolete by more efficient ETH derivatives
- Regulatory risks as DeFi faces increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Cat-themed meme coin with zero utility
- Created to capitalize on animal meme trends
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Gaming token with minimal adoption outside Korea
- Play-to-earn model has failed across the industry
- Cannot compete with traditional gaming on entertainment value
- Regulatory uncertainty for gaming tokens in key markets
- Ponzi-like economic model requiring constant new players
Why it's going to zero:
- Distributed hosting platform that remains in perpetual development
- HoloFuel mainnet launch delayed for years
- Cannot compete with centralized hosting on cost or reliability
- Complex architecture creating unnecessary user friction
- Token will be replaced by HoloFuel if mainnet ever launches
Why it's going to zero:
- Fitness-related token with minimal adoption
- Cannot compete with established fitness apps and platforms
- Token unnecessary for fitness tracking functionality
- Value proposition undermined by traditional fitness solutions
- Will fade into obscurity as move-to-earn trend collapses
Why it's going to zero:
- Cross-chain messaging protocol with centralization concerns
- Relayer system creating single points of failure
- Bridge technology inherently vulnerable to security issues
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token for CHEX with minimal market presence
- Limited exchange volume compared to competitors
- Minimal utility beyond trading fee discounts
- Will be worthless if the exchange faces regulatory issues
- Cannot compete with larger exchange tokens on liquidity
Why it's going to zero:
- Aave's stablecoin with minimal adoption despite platform size
- Launched in bear market with insufficient demand
- Unable to maintain peg consistently since launch
- Regulatory risks as stablecoins face increased scrutiny
- Cannot compete with established stablecoins on liquidity
Why it's going to zero:
- Derivative meme coin of a meme coin with zero utility
- Excessive token supply in the quadrillions
- Created purely to capitalize on Dogecoin's popularity
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Mobile-first blockchain with limited adoption despite years of effort
- Social impact focus but minimal real-world usage
- Unable to compete with traditional mobile payment solutions
- Complex multi-token system creating unnecessary friction
- Cannot compete with established Layer 1s for developer attention
Why it's going to zero:
- Arrakis Finance stablecoin with minimal adoption
- Limited transparency about backing assets
- Regulatory risks as stablecoins face increased scrutiny
- Cannot compete with established stablecoins on liquidity
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Cosmos-based DEX with limited usage outside Cosmos ecosystem
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from trading fees
- Incentivized liquidity creating artificial demand
- Revenue entirely dependent on Cosmos ecosystem's health
- Cannot compete with cross-chain DEXs on liquidity
Why it's going to zero:
- Wealth management platform token with minimal utility
- Premium features tied to token staking creating artificial demand
- Regulatory risks as wealth management faces increased scrutiny
- Cannot compete with traditional wealth management on services
- Token unnecessary for the platform to function properly
Why it's going to zero:
- 'Green' mining narrative undermined by massive hard drive waste
- Proof of Space consensus failed to gain meaningful adoption
- Storage farming became unprofitable for most participants
- Pre-farm controversy giving insiders massive token allocation
- Cannot compete with established cryptocurrencies on liquidity
Why it's going to zero:
- Blockchain intelligence platform with controversial privacy implications
- Premium features paywalled behind token creating artificial demand
- Doxxing capabilities raising serious ethical concerns
- Token unnecessary for the platform's core functionality
- Regulatory risks as privacy violations face increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Cross-chain bridge protocol with inherent security vulnerabilities
- Bridge technology repeatedly proven to be hack-prone
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
- Cannot overcome the fundamental security trilemma of bridges
Why it's going to zero:
- Dog-themed meme coin with zero utility
- Created to capitalize on animal meme trends
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin-based dog meme token with zero utility
- Created purely to capitalize on Bitcoin Ordinals hype
- Bloats the Bitcoin blockchain with unnecessary data
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- First Bitcoin Ordinals token with no utility beyond speculation
- Bloats the Bitcoin blockchain with unnecessary data
- Created purely for speculation rather than functionality
- Will become irrelevant as Ordinals hype fades
- No meaningful use case beyond collectibles
Why it's going to zero:
- AI gaming token with minimal actual AI technology
- Created to capitalize on AI and gaming buzzwords
- Vague roadmap with unrealistic promises
- Team lacks AI research credentials
- Will be exposed as vaporware when bull market ends
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin fork with hybrid consensus that failed to gain adoption
- Governance system captured by large stakeholders
- Privacy features made irrelevant by more advanced solutions
- Declining developer activity and community involvement
- Cannot compete with Bitcoin or privacy-focused alternatives
Why it's going to zero:
- Neo's gas token with minimal utility as Neo itself struggles
- Two-token system (NEO/GAS) creates unnecessary complexity
- Completely dependent on Neo's limited ecosystem
- Cannot compete with single-token blockchains on simplicity
- Will become worthless if Neo fails to gain traction
Why it's going to zero:
- Exchange token for BTSE with limited market presence
- Minimal utility beyond trading fee discounts
- Value entirely dependent on a single exchange's success
- Will be worthless if BTSE faces regulatory issues
- Cannot compete with larger exchange tokens on utility
Why it's going to zero:
- Bridged ETH with multiple points of failure
- Smart contract vulnerabilities on both Ethereum and StarkNet
- Bridge hacks have led to billions in losses across crypto
- Less liquid than native ETH with greater withdrawal/deposit friction
- Will be made obsolete by native cross-chain solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Solana-based Layer 2 creating unnecessary complexity
- Completely dependent on Solana's stability and security
- Vulnerable to Solana's frequent network outages
- Governance token with minimal value accrual
- Cannot compete with Solana's native scaling solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- AI narrative token with no actual AI technology
- Created to capitalize on AI and storytelling buzzwords
- Vague roadmap with unrealistic promises
- Team lacks AI research credentials
- Will be exposed as vaporware when bull market ends
Why it's going to zero:
- Wrapped staked stablecoin creating triple layer of risk
- Complex mechanism that few users understand
- Smart contract vulnerabilities across multiple protocols
- Adds unnecessary complexity to simple stablecoin exposure
- Will face the same regulatory challenges as all stablecoins
Why it's going to zero:
- Privacy-focused coin with limited adoption
- Cannot compete with established privacy coins like Monero
- MimbleWimble protocol limitations undermining privacy claims
- Regulatory risks as privacy coins face increased scrutiny
- Limited exchange listings due to compliance concerns
Why it's going to zero:
- Early Bitcoin fork that failed to gain meaningful adoption
- No clear differentiation from dozens of similar alternatives
- Minimal development activity despite years in the market
- Cannot compete with Bitcoin or more innovative alternatives
- Community-driven approach led to lack of focused direction
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized storage platform with minimal adoption
- Cannot compete with centralized storage on cost or reliability
- Storage costs significantly higher than alternatives like AWS
- Limited provider network despite years of development
- Token economics don't align with actual storage costs
Why it's going to zero:
- Another ETH staking derivative in an oversaturated market
- Smart contract risks across the staking process
- Limited differentiation from other staking solutions
- Small team with limited security resources
- Will be made obsolete by more established staking providers
Why it's going to zero:
- Another Bitcoin derivative with multiple layers of risk
- Smart contract vulnerabilities could lead to total loss
- Limited adoption and exchange support
- Small team managing significant Bitcoin holdings
- Will be made obsolete by more established Bitcoin derivatives
Why it's going to zero:
- Decentralized infrastructure provider with minimal adoption
- Cannot compete with centralized cloud providers on cost or reliability
- Staking services creating centralization concerns
- Multiple pivots showing lack of clear vision
- Token unnecessary for the infrastructure to function properly
Why it's going to zero:
- Supply chain blockchain with limited real-world adoption
- Cannot solve the oracle problem for physical goods
- Enterprise blockchain solutions consistently fail to deliver value
- Token economics don't align with actual supply chain costs
- Cannot compete with traditional supply chain solutions on efficiency
Why it's going to zero:
- Obscure token with unclear utility or purpose
- Limited market presence and exchange listings
- Small team with minimal track record
- No clear technological differentiation
- Will disappear in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Early blockchain that failed to gain meaningful adoption
- Abandoned by original developers for Symbol blockchain
- Minimal development activity for years
- Cannot compete with newer, more innovative blockchains
- Multiple hacks and security issues damaged reputation
Why it's going to zero:
- Asset-focused Bitcoin fork with limited adoption
- ASIC-resistant mining goal failed as ASICs were developed
- Asset issuance use case better served by other platforms
- Minimal development activity in recent years
- Cannot compete with Ethereum and other platforms for tokenization
Why it's going to zero:
- DeFi yield aggregator with declining relevance since DeFi summer
- Yield opportunities have diminished dramatically
- Limited value accrual for token holders despite protocol fees
- Cannot compete with centralized yield platforms on returns
- Regulatory risks as yield generation faces increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Gambling platform token with regulatory risks
- Casino profit sharing model facing gambling regulations
- Limited utility beyond the Rollbit platform
- Will be worthless if Rollbit faces serious regulatory action
- Cannot compete with established gambling platforms
Why it's going to zero:
- Avalanche staking derivative with multiple layers of risk
- Completely dependent on Avalanche's security and stability
- Smart contract vulnerabilities across the staking process
- Regulatory risks as staking services face increased scrutiny
- Limited differentiation from other AVAX staking solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Social platform token with minimal adoption
- Cannot compete with established social networks
- Token unnecessary for basic social features
- Small team with limited development resources
- Will struggle to maintain relevance in overcrowded market
Why it's going to zero:
- Derivatives exchange facing increasing regulatory scrutiny
- Governance token with minimal value accrual from trading fees
- Limited liquidity compared to centralized alternatives
- Regulatory crackdown on crypto derivatives is inevitable
- Cannot compete with established derivatives exchanges
Why it's going to zero:
- Bitcoin mining token with centralization concerns
- Mining returns diminishing with each Bitcoin halving
- Environmental concerns around Bitcoin mining
- Token unnecessary for mining operations to function
- Regulatory risks as mining faces increased scrutiny
Why it's going to zero:
- Cat-themed meme coin with zero utility
- Created to capitalize on animal meme trends
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on social media hype
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Gaming NFT platform with minimal adoption by major games
- Failed to deliver on cross-game item promises
- Cannot compete with traditional gaming item systems
- NFT gaming hype has collapsed with limited recovery prospects
- Regulatory uncertainty for gaming tokens in key markets
Why it's going to zero:
- Cat-themed meme coin with zero utility
- Created as a joke during dog coin mania
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on meme culture references
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Internet meme-based token with zero utility
- Created purely to capitalize on viral internet trends
- No development team or technological roadmap
- Value based entirely on cultural references
- Will be forgotten when the next meme coin trend arrives
Why it's going to zero:
- Psychedelic medicine token with regulatory concerns
- Token unnecessary for actual medical research
- Legal uncertainties around psychedelic treatments
- Cannot actually solve medical regulatory challenges
- Will face serious regulatory scrutiny in most jurisdictions
Why it's going to zero:
- Merger of NuCypher and Keep Network with limited success
- Privacy and threshold cryptography with minimal adoption
- Complex governance system from merged projects
- Regulatory risks as privacy technologies face scrutiny
- Cannot compete with more user-friendly privacy solutions
Why it's going to zero:
- Curve yield optimizer adding unnecessary complexity to DeFi
- Value entirely dependent on Curve's ecosystem
- Governance captured by large token holders
- Regulatory risks as yield farming faces increased scrutiny
- Creates systemic risk across the DeFi ecosystem
Why it's going to zero:
- Gaming token with minimal actual game development
- Cannot compete with established gaming companies
- Token unnecessary for gaming functionality
- Small team with limited development resources
- Will be forgotten in the next market downturn
Why it's going to zero:
- Governance token for failed FEI stablecoin
- Project effectively shutdown after FEI collapse
- Lost millions in DeFi hacks and exploits
- Failed algorithmic stablecoin experiment
- Cannot recover from fundamental design flaws
Why it's going to zero:
- Enterprise blockchain with minimal adoption after years
- Cloud computing focus overtaken by superior alternatives
- Failed to deliver on technical promises despite funding
- Cannot compete with established Layer 1s for developers
- Enterprise blockchain solutions consistently fail to deliver value
Why it's going to zero:
- AI and metaverse token with minimal actual technology
- Created to capitalize on trending buzzwords
- Vague roadmap with unrealistic promises
- Team lacks proven track record in AI or VR
- Will be exposed as vaporware when bull market ends
Why it's going to zero:
- Tron-based DeFi platform controlled by Justin Sun
- History of copying other protocols without innovation
- Connected to Tron ecosystem with questionable governance
- Multiple rebrands and pivots showing lack of direction
- Cannot compete with more established DeFi protocols
Why it's going to zero:
- AI hype token with no actual AI technology
- Created to capitalize on AI and liquidity buzzwords
- Vague roadmap with unrealistic promises
- Team lacks AI research credentials
- Will be exposed as vaporware when bull market ends
AI-generated content @2025. For educational purposes only. Some news and marketcaps might be outdated. Made for fun.
Short them on Hyperliquid, ByBit or MEXC
